Finding our Homies, Step 2

If you haven't yet, first contribute a problem statement.

Read the problem statements of others and comment on the voting thread with a number from 1 to 6 for every other person's problem statement. This table will eventually summarize the results.

Here's the rubric for the numeric scale:

0: This is my problem statement.
1: This is a rewording of my problem statement.
2: This overlaps almost entirely with my problem statement.
3: I care about this problem.
4: This doesn't seem like a big problem.
5: This is fine, I don't think it is a problem.
6: This statement is alien to me, I don't understand it.

Alternatively, download and fill in your row in this html page, then click to download a local copy. Then share it on the voting thread. This is optional, though. This janky table will need a large screen to comfortably fill in.

	Ivan Reese	Arvind Thyagarajan	Jasmine Otto	Jimmy Miller	Kartik Agaram	avon	Eli Mellen	Paul Tarvydas	Konrad Hinsen	Tom Larkworthy	Dany	Nilesh Trivedi	Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin	Jason Morris	Guyren Howe	Duncan Cragg
Ivan Reese	1	3.5	2.5	1	1-5	4	0.9	6	6	4i	1 + <3	5?	3	>6	6.0	3
Arvind Thyagarajan	3	0	3	3	2	3	6	6	2	2	3	6	3	3	6	2
Jasmine Otto			0
Jimmy Miller				0
Kartik Agaram	6	1	3	3	0	2	6	6	2	2	6	4	3	3	6
avon						0
Eli Mellen							0
Paul Tarvydas								0
Konrad Hinsen		2	2		2	2			0				2
Tom Larkworthy	3	2	2	2	2	1	2	4	2	0	3	2	1	2	3	3
Dany	6	4	2	1	4	4	6	6	3	2	0	2	4	5	3	6
Nilesh Trivedi												0
Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin													0
Jason Morris														0
Guyren Howe															0
Duncan Cragg																0